【梁一包養網站中和】朱子《四書章句集注》的解釋學意義

作者:

分類:

requestId:68499ab6f1dd94.04138036.

The interpretation of Zhu Zi’s “Collected Notes on the Four Chapters”

Author: Liang Zhonghe (Dr. Philosophy, Associate Professor of the Department of Philosophy in Sichuan)

Source: “Second Collection of Commerce”, Sichuan National Library of China 2012

Time: Confucius was in the 2569th year of the 7th month of the fourth month of Wuxu

             Jesus May 21, 2018

 

1. Overview of interpretation on Eastern meaning

 

From the source of the word, “interpretation of Hermeneutik” originated from Hermes, an ancient Greek “messenger who lived to God”[1]. His mission was to convey God’s news and instigation to people quickly. The transmission instructions here are a translation and explanation. Therefore, modern Eastern literary writers have used “translation” and “interpretation” to define interpretation, that is, to describe the final transformation of a language – the question of the transformation from a strange language world (the world of God) to our own language world.

 

Explanation includes at most three elements: understanding, explanation, and application. “Understanding is always an explanation, because interpretation is an expression of understanding” [2], application refers to “using broad principles, facts or views, that is, true content to explain the current specific situation” [3], and “the essence of understanding is explanation and application.” [4] In modern times, these three are called skills, which are practical skills, so interpretation is a kind of practical wisdom.

 

There are six forms of interpretations from history:

 

1, which was originally an explanation of the theory of the “Sacred”;

 

2, and then developed into a broad linguistic interpretation from it, which was used to discuss its important interpretations of syntax and historical interpretations;

 

3, Schleiermah completed the explanation of understanding science or art to understand the interpretation of the science of peace and art. It has become an understanding of all texts, that is, the understanding of the author’s thinking and career history, and its goal is to “firstly interpret the text as well as the author, and then even better interpret the text than the author” [5];

 

4, but the interpretation of this broad-based approach is compared with the “scientific” of the natural sciences at that time and later, and lacks the basis of cognitive theory. Diertai proposed the “Estimate Science Geisteswissenschafte to change this situationn”[6], whose object is an object of past energy or life, and understanding is the energy or life that has passed from the head to the body;

 

5, Heidegger will explain the theory of existence, he believes that understanding is not the method of the subject’s behavior, but the method of existence in his own wayBreeding, Gadamer used this to develop a philosophical explanation. He advocated that “the problem is not what we did, but what is beyond our wish to see and act and develop along the way with us.” [7]

 

6, Gay also believed that contemporary interpretation is a philosophy of theory and practice, and should “focus on Aristotle’s practical wisdom,” and try to restore Chen’s actual wisdom or practical sentimental concept from the beginning to determine its truth in human science. href=”https://twsugarhoney520.org/”>BaojiaoThe positive form”. [8]

 

From the above brief description, three transitions in the history of explanation can be drawn:

 

1, from special explanation to broad explanation; [9]

 

2, from method On the intrinsic interpretation; [10]

 

3, the explanation from single intrinsic philosophy to real philosophy.

 

This series of transformations is related to a kind of effort, especially since Dirtte, Eastern scholars such as Gadhamur, who believe that “modern science occupies a ruling position in the philosophical interpretation and proof of the concept of knowledge and truth”, [11] They Not satisfied with this situation, we must resist this extensive request for scientific methods. These efforts are the progress of the explanation discussed below. The “scientific science” that will be faced in China tomorrow, [12] can be compared with the scientific methods of the East; and the Chinese philosophy, which is importantly represented by Confucianism, is similar to the spiritual science of the East, and is based on the cooperation and respect for “people” and the certain vigilance of today’s science. This is why we can It is an important reason for introducing the Eastern Explanation to the Confucian tradition. This article will limit this comparison to the interpretation and thinking of the Eastern Explanation and the “Collected Notes of the Four Chapters” by Zhu Zi. The focus is on understanding Zhu Zi’s interpretation of the “Four Books”, and the goal is to explore the ability of Confucian tradition represented by the “Four Books”.

 

The research and development needs of China’s interpretation in today’s dynasty<a What the Baoqing Network explains is that this article is not setting up a subjective explanation for the tree to "grace" Chinese academic (in my opinion, it is only a targeted and subjective play rather than a transmission of some so-called "traditional resources", but a flesh and blood, life-oriented and self-contained; it is not a stand-in place.The ancients "observed" stands for the "observation" of the history or the introduction of history, because in my opinion, treating Confucianism with the "historical" perspective is exactly the practice of cutting off and abandoning the tradition of Confucianism.

 

2. A kind of understanding/explanation of Zhu Xi’s interpretation

 

According to the “Zhu Xi Nian” (Wang Mao-hong), Zhu Xi’s father was “famous scholars” by Confucianism. [13] Zhu Xi was taught by his father since childhood and was four years old. I once asked, “What is above the sky?”[14] When I was called different by his father, I was confused by “What is outside the sky? What is inside?”[15] I knew the need for singing skills at the age of eight or nine. [16] My 14th-year-old father was taught by three teachers, Liu Pingshan, Liu Caotang and Hu Jixi, and continued to receive Confucian teachings from the two Cheng series. [17] It can be seen that the Confucianism inherited by Zhu Zijie was his inheritance mission of “born”, because he wanted to be as filial to his father as he was, and because of his early years of experience, he focused on learning for himself, not to exaggerate outside, but to seek the establishment of self-consciousness and the implementation of virtue inside. He had been in the “difficult” period, and [博手机18] It was precisely a “thinkable me” who really raised questions to himself. Only then did his understanding of tradition really relate to himself, and he was looking for himself in the Confucian classics.

 

It can be said that the birth of life is an explanation of the matter, and Zhu Xi’s explanation of the language was created here. His existence is precisely in such a kind of inheritance, and the most important manifestation of this is “study for learning”.

 

Learning not only includes the “learning civilized knowledge” that tomorrow says, but more about learning how to be a person. [19] can also be said that what you need to learn is to be a person. The “people” here are not biological meanings but refer to the “reason” of human beings, that is, people who “people who are regarded as”. Learning can almost outline a person’s lifelong efforts (the process of learning is to do “kung fu”). Learning is divided into two or two stages. Elementary school means “to do this first”, doing some things that are about the number of archery books and scrutiny, which means doing some rules and rules without knowing the reason; there is also a primary school refers to the learning of knowledge in literature. Zhu Zi once said that Han Wei Shu “reads the correct pronunciation, practices the examination, and describes the famous things. Their achievements are great. If a student does not talk about it first, why should he put it into practice?” [20] The work of literacy is a necessary conditional knowledge and skills for him. Major studies include reading, perseverance, and practice. [21] is to know why they do this based on primary school. Reading is a process of understanding the unity of peace and stability. It is a system of application, understanding and understanding. It also reflects the “reality” meaning of Zhu Zi’s explanation, especially when facing the situation of “human desires are in turmoil, and the laws of nature are terrifying, and now I think about it” [22] and “Since the late age, the vulgarity was vulgar, and the great scholars and officials rely on bullying to win titles and lords to achieve success” [23]. In addition, there were many people who taught at that time.”Each person is i


留言

發佈留言

發佈留言必須填寫的電子郵件地址不會公開。 必填欄位標示為 *